Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests

Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests.

Costfoto / NurPhoto / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

The US Department of the Interior decided not to approve Class III gaming compacts with two California tribes — the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria and the Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians — claiming that they violated portions of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

Tachi Palace Casino ResortThe Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif, seen above. The federal government recently denied two compacts signed by the State of California, including one with the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria to expand their resort. (Image: tachipalace.com)

Both tribes were reportedly planning a “casino resort complex,” according to rejection letters sent to the tribes and the state. These plans include building new restaurants and hotels that operate beyond the gaming spaces regulated by the Tribe’s Gaming Commission.

Taking issue with several definitions in the compacts, the feds wrote, The 2022 compact confers expansive powers on the state and local governments to regulate the tribe’s activities and lands that are not directly related to the actual conduct of gaming.”

State-tribal Class III gaming compacts are agreements between the state and separate tribal governments that specify how many gaming devices and casinos a single tribe can operate, according to the Tribal Alliance of Sovereign Indian Nations.

The Santa Rosa Rancheria had planned to expand the gaming space in their Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif. by 44,000 square feet and build a 12-room hotel tower, a bingo hall/conference center, and a three-level garage.

Newsom Slams Decision

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) strongly rebuked the feds’ decision, warning of its repercussions. He said in a statement that the disapprovals Threaten the ability of these and other tribes to invest and maintain jobs in many of California’s economically disadvantaged communities.

He noted that the compacts were “carefully negotiated by the state and the tribes in compliance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act” to give tribes the “economic benefits of gaming while mitigating impacts to local communities.” And he noted that this latest agreement came on top of existing compacts signed between the tribes and the state in 1999.

This is the second time the Interior Department has disapproved of compacts with the same tribes, following a similar decision in November 2021.

California has ratified gaming compacts with 75 tribes, and currently hosts 66 casinos operated by 63 tribes, according to the California Gambling Control Commission.

Article Sources
Las Vegas Strip Attraction Closing After Only 7 Months editorial policy.
  1. Omaha Beach Returns to Racing Saturday in Santa Anita Sprint Championship

Compare Accounts
×
Gambler Loses $100,000 Jackpot to Woman He Asked to Hit the Button “For Luck”
Provider
Name
Description
Atlantic City Casinos Generate Record Tax Revenue Largely Because of iGaming  Virginia Legislation Could Give Sports Betting a Chance in 2020  Connecticut Tribes up Ante for Third Casino by Offering State More Tax Revenue  Arizona Downs Ends Meet Early, Cites ‘Uncertainty’ Over Access to Off-Track Betting Feeds as Cause  Boyd Gaming Among Mid-Cap Stocks Poised to Deliver Q3 Earnings Surprises  Las Vegas Tourism Brass Slated to Receive Pay Raises  Southwest Airlines Cancels Nearly 2,000 Weekend Flights, More Than 200 in Vegas  Indiana Gaming Commission Greenlights Betting on 2020 Academy Awards  Curaçao Moves Closer to iGaming Overhaul as Reforms Head to Parliament  UK Bookie Pays Out on Red Rum Bet 43 Years Late